Inhibition – Importance

“…inhibition is a requirement for self-regulation because one cannot direct actions or behavior toward one’s self if one is automatically responding impulsively to an immediate event.”1

Persons who displayed low self-control during childhood reported a range of difficulties at age 32. These included worse physical health, greater depression, higher likelihood of drug dependence, lower socioeconomic status, lower income, greater likelihood of single-parenthood, worse financial planning, more financial struggles, and most important for a criminological audience, more criminal convictions.2

Inhibition is the key cognitive process of self-control,3 which is the key to success in every3 phase of life.

Education

Unsurprisingly, students with better inhibitory control do better than those without it.3 This is particularly true in math and reading,4,5 where the inability to inhibit internal and external distractions and regulate attention can cause students to struggle with assignments that are otherwise well within their ability.

Socialization

Inhibition is also required for healthy social interactions at every age. Being able to inhibit irrelevant or counter-productive thoughts, words, and actions is an important part of building and maintaining friendships.6

Romantic relationships in particular can suffer when one or more partners has dysfunctional inhibitory control, with such people reporting more difficulties and less satisfaction within their marriages.7

Employment & Finances

People with dysfunctional inhibitory control also have difficulties with maintaining steady employment, whether due to the impairments interfering with the job duties, leading to being fired or let go, or from impulsive job quitting/switching.8

Unfortunately the unstable employment only adds to the financial difficulties that also come with poor inhibition. For example, research has shown that individuals with ADHD (primarily a disorder of poor inhibitory control) “incur more auto loans, have more difficulty paying bills, and open fewer savings accounts than their peers.”9 Poor inhibitory control has also been found in those who gamble 5 or more times a year.10

Criminality

There is substantial “empirical support linking self- control to conduct problems and crime,”2 However, while reduced self-control is a risk factor for criminality, most people with poor self-control will not become criminals.

…pathological criminal offenders are theorized to develop from interactions between life-course-persistent offenders’ global neuropsychological deficits and adverse environments in which they are raised**. Neuropsychological deficits create a suite of deficits for these offenders, but central among them is low self-control—a behavioral tendency that paves the road from temperamental difficultness, to conduct problems, to delinquency, to crime, and ultimately to criminal justice system penalties. 2

Health

Lower self-control has been linked to poor health, increased depression, self-injury, suicide attempts, substance abuse, and obesity.2,9,11 Risky sexual behavior is also more common.8

Memory

As noted above, impaired inhibition effects more than just what can be witnessed from the outside. Inhibition is an important cognitive process that is also involved in invisible processes such as memory and thought. People with impaired inhibitory control are “more likely to retrieve irrelevant information while attempting to retrieve relevant information.”12 And for those who “may be less able to inhibit prepotent or Traumatic memories, those memories may be more likely to become intrusive,” contributing to conditions such as PTSD.12

Positives

Despite the negatives that come with lower inhibitory control and subsequent increased risk taking, there are positives as well.

It is also important to remember, however, that not all forms of risk-taking are necessarily deviant or antisocial. In fact, mainstream society endorses and admires those who take risks in areas such as sports, exploration, or acts of bravery.13

Sources:

  1. 1.
    Antshel KM, Hier BO, Barkley RA. Executive Functioning Theory and ADHD. In: Goldstein S, Naglieri JA, eds. Handbook of Executive Functioning. Springer; 2014:567.
  2. 2.
    DeLisi M. Low Self-Control Is a Brain-Based Disorder. In: Beaver KM, Barnes JC, Boutwell BB, eds. The Nurture Versus Biosocial Debate in Criminology. SAGE; 2014:472.
  3. 3.
    Duckworth AL, Taxer JL, Eskreis-Winkler L, Galla BM, Gross JJ. Self-Control and Academic Achievement. Annu Rev Psychol. January 2019:373-399. doi:10.1146/annurev-psych-010418-103230
  4. 4.
    St Clair-Thompson HL, Gathercole SE. Executive functions and achievements in school: Shifting, updating, inhibition, and working memory. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology. April 2006:745-759. doi:10.1080/17470210500162854
  5. 5.
    de Bruijn AGM, Hartman E, Kostons D, Visscher C, Bosker RJ. Exploring the relations among physical fitness, executive functioning, and low academic achievement. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology. March 2018:204-221. doi:10.1016/j.jecp.2017.10.010
  6. 6.
    Geurts HM, de Vries M, van den Bergh SFWM. Executive Functioning Theory and Autism. In: Goldstein S, Naglieri JA, eds. Handbook of Executive Functioning. Springer; 2014:567.
  7. 7.
    Másdóttir HU. Romantic relationships, emotional regulation and quality of life among adults with ADHD in comparison with adults with no ADHD. 2017. http://hdl.handle.net/1946/28707.
  8. 8.
    Barkley RA, Murphy KR. Impairment in Occupational Functioning and Adult ADHD: The Predictive Utility of Executive Function (EF) Ratings Versus EF Tests. Archives of Clinical Neuropsychology. March 2010:157-173. doi:10.1093/arclin/acq014
  9. 9.
    Beauchaine TP, Ben-David I, Sela A. Attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder, delay discounting, and risky financial behaviors: A preliminary analysis of self-report data. Lidzba K, ed. PLoS ONE. May 2017:e0176933. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0176933
  10. 10.
    Chamberlain SR, Ioannidis K, Leppink EW, Niaz F, Redden SA, Grant JE. ADHD symptoms in non-treatment seeking young adults: relationship with other forms of impulsivity. CNS Spectr. September 2016:22-30. doi:10.1017/s1092852915000875
  11. 11.
    Batterink L, Yokum S, Stice E. Body mass correlates inversely with inhibitory control in response to food among adolescent girls: An fMRI study. NeuroImage. October 2010:1696-1703. doi:10.1016/j.neuroimage.2010.05.059
  12. 12.
    Storm BC, White HA. ADHD and retrieval-induced forgetting: Evidence for a deficit in the inhibitory control of memory. Memory. April 2010:265-271. doi:10.1080/09658210903547884
  13. 13.
    Pharo H, Sim C, Graham M, Gross J, Hayne H. Risky business: Executive function, personality, and reckless behavior during adolescence and emerging adulthood. Behavioral Neuroscience. December 2011:970-978. doi:10.1037/a0025768