“Just as regulatory agencies cannot enforce laws without actually monitoring whether companies are adhering to them, human self-regulatory systems cannot adequately control their behavior without some degree of awareness of the ongoing operations of the system.”1
Self-monitoring is “the evaluation of one’s own behavior in order to determine when a different approach is necessary, including noticing and fixing mistakes, knowing when help is required, and understanding when a task is completed,”2 which includes having “an awareness of one’s own social behavior and the effect this might have on others.”3
There are several types of self-monitoring, including:
Performance Monitoring, which alerts “the cognitive control system when increased control is required to achieve acceptable performance levels.”1 Sub-processes include:
- Error Monitoring – the detection of errors one commits1
- Outcome Monitoring – “evaluating whether outcomes are worse than expected”1
- Conflict Monitoring – when competing stimulus information activates the error monitoring and other self-monitoring cognitive processes.4 (though the existence of conflict monitoring as a unique process is contested.5)
Metacognition or metacognitive/cognitive monitoring, which is the conscious awareness of one’s own current cognitive activity.3 It includes:
- Uncertainty monitoring – the evaluation of a “subjective sense of certainty about the likely accuracy of a response or decision.”1
- Attention monitoring – evaluating if one’s attention is where it should be at any given time.6
- Interoception – “Subjective awareness of one’s physiological, emotional, and cognitive states”1
Across the Lifespan
Self-monitoring starts early, with cognitive monitoring emerging at preschool age. These skills improve throughout childhood and adolescence, with a notable effect of social contexts increasing error monitoring in early to mid adolescence, though by older adolescence error monitoring does not appear to have notable differences between social and non-social contexts.1 The development of self-monitoring abilities “have a profound impact on the development of self-regulation, helping children to detect instances when they should proceed with caution and providing them with the motivation to adjust their actions as necessary to ensure adequate performance in changing contexts.”1
Sources:
- 1.Lyons KE, Zelazo PD. Monitoring, metacognition, and executive function. In: Advances in Child Development and Behavior. Elsevier; 2011:379-412. doi:10.1016/b978-0-12-386491-8.00010-4
- 2.Naglieri JA, Goldstein S. Using the Comprehensive Executive Function Inventory (CEFI) to Assess Executive Function: From Theory to Application. In: Goldstein S, Naglieri JA, eds. Handbook of Executive Functioning. Springer; 2014:567.
- 3.Roth RM, Isquith PK, Gioia GA. Assessment of Executive Functioning Using the Behavior Rating Inventory of Executive Function (BRIEF). In: Goldstein S, Naglieri JA, eds. Handbook of Executive Functioning. Springer; 2014:567.
- 4.Larson MJ, Clayson PE, Keith CM, et al. Cognitive control adjustments in healthy older and younger adults: Conflict adaptation, the error-related negativity (ERN), and evidence of generalized decline with age. Biological Psychology. March 2016:50-63. doi:10.1016/j.biopsycho.2016.01.008
- 5.Schmidt JR. Evidence against conflict monitoring and adaptation: An updated review. Psychon Bull Rev. December 2018. doi:10.3758/s13423-018-1520-z
- 6.Harris KR, Graham S, Reid R, McElroy K, Hamby RS. Self-Monitoring of Attention versus Self-Monitoring of Performance: Replication and Cross-Task Comparison Studies. Learning Disability Quarterly. 1994:121. doi:10.2307/1511182